Rugby Player Vs American Football Player

American football vs rugby comparison.

Rugby player vs american football player.

American football is a game played between two teams and consists of 11 players in each of the two teams with unlimited substitutions. Lovers of rugby will say that nfl american football players lack the stamina to play over 80 minutes while nfl fans may feel that rugby players lack the tactical discipline to succeed in american football. American football is a game of intense physical play with complex strategy to score points by advancing the ball to the. American football players are already more athletic than rugby players across the board and have all the necessary skills it takes to be great rugby players.

Because there aren t many skills. He noted that rugby players must be skilled in tackling running and handling the ball all aspects of the game whereas football players are specialized to certain techniques making them less. Leonard fournette is the american football player that espn writer kevin van valkenburg says is a superior athlete to any new zealand rugby player. And while those statements may be true for some players there are a few who have proven otherwise.

Rugby has a field of 15 players who stay on the pitch for the entire game whereas in american football there are only 11 players on the pitch at any one time. Rugby players run more hit more and have to be mentally switched on for 69 more minutes than american football players. This comparison of the two sports covers all angles. The yog blog compares american football to rugby to find out which one has more yog appeal.

Rugby players don t wear helmets but rather scrum caps which do little more than prevent cauliflower ear though again it s the helmet that allows for harder hits and a harder projectile.